For Editor

Editor Guideline

The following are screening guidelines for INBIS: Innovation of Business and Information Systems editors to help ensure that submitted manuscripts meet the quality and relevance standards for publication consideration:

  1. General Eligibility: a. Ensure that the manuscript adheres to the journal's writing guidelines. b. Check that the manuscript has passed the plagiarism check and adheres to research ethics. c. Ensure that the manuscript aligns with the journal's focus and scope.
  2. Quality of Methodology and Research Design: a. Review the research design and methodology used. b. Ensure that the research methods are consistent and align with scientific standards. c. Consider whether the sample and study population have been selected appropriately.
  3. Data Analysis and Results: a. Review the data analysis to ensure statistical accuracy and precision. b. Check that the research results are presented clearly and align with the research objectives. c. Ensure that the interpretation of the results is adequate and supported by the data presented.
  4. 4. Quality of Writing and Presentation: a. Check grammar, spelling, and writing style. b. Review that the manuscript's structure conforms to journal guidelines. c. Consider whether the authors present arguments and concepts clearly and cohesively.
  5. Significance and Contribution: a. Evaluate whether the research contributes significantly to the existing literature. b. Review whether the research results have practical or policy implications.
  6. Importance to Readers: a. Consider the relevance and importance of the manuscript to the journal's target audience. b. Review whether the manuscript provides new insights or a better understanding of the topic.
  7. References and Literature: a. Ensure that all reference sources are cited correctly and in accordance with the journal's guidelines. b. Evaluate the accuracy and relevance of the literature used.
  8. Conclusions and Recommendations: a. Review the conclusions to ensure they align with the research findings. b. Provide constructive suggestions, if necessary, to improve the quality of the manuscript.
  9. Research Ethics: a. Ensure that research ethics and the use of human or animal subjects have been properly followed. b. Review conflicts of interest, if any, and whether they have been transparently disclosed.
  10. Additional Considerations: a. Note whether the manuscript meets the format and length requirements set by the journal. b. Review comments and responses from previous reviewers (if any).

It's important to note that these guidelines can be adapted to the specific editorial policies and guidelines of a particular scientific journal. Furthermore, the review process may involve more than one editor to ensure objective decisions.